Which statement is true concerning the covering of injured eyes with rigid eye shields?

The correct statement regarding the covering of injured eyes with rigid eye shields is that only the injured eye should be covered. This practice is critical in managing eye injuries, as it helps protect the injured eye from additional trauma and reduces the risk of further complications, such as contamination or movement that could exacerbate the injury.

Covering only the injured eye allows for visibility and monitoring of the unaffected eye, which is important for assessing overall vision and any potential changes in the patient's condition. In cases of significant eye trauma, it is essential to maintain protective measures for the injured eye without impairing the ability to assess or respond to the situation effectively.

Covering both eyes is generally not advised unless specifically directed, as it can limit the patient’s ability to orient themselves and may lead to confusion or difficulty in movement. Prohibition of eye shields is also not appropriate, as they can provide necessary protection when used correctly. Covering the unaffected eye would not serve the purpose of protecting the injured eye, and could potentially lead to unnecessary risk if the injured eye is left exposed.